Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Book Review: Call of the Mild, by Lily Raff McCallou


Hunters and anglers often rankle when people refer to their pursuits as “hobbies.”  Most, myself included, are okay with  “sports,” but for some even that’s too watery a description, evoking people tossing balls around courts or mowed fields.   Outdoorspeople may protest that that fishing and hunting are passions, engrossing disciplines that demand long study as well as the best that body, heart, and mind can give.    They are labors that can come to define their aficionados.   They become dominant influences on how their practitioners see nature and society, and may dramatically reorient the views and values of those who adopt them as adults.   Call of the Mild: How I Learned to Hunt My Own Dinner  by Lily Raff McCallou offers a compelling demonstration of that last effect.   A  self-conscious and unassuming memoir, Call of the Mild nonetheless has the potential to upend the assumptions of both hunters and nonhunters about what it means to hunt (or not) and to simply live in a world where all of us—humans as surely as their furred, feathered, or finned relations—eventually become prey.  

In keeping with a pattern that must have been common in America a couple of centuries ago, The author’s evolution from gun-fearing nonhunter to gun-toting hunter began when she moved west.  An aspiring screenwriter in New York  paying the bills as a filmmaker’s assistant, Lily Raff was drawn to journalism  by the idea of getting paid to write stories  every day but lacked the credentials for a job at a paper in the city.    Figuring she had a better chance at joining a small town paper, she applied for a reporter position at a Bend, Oregon daily and was hired.   Initially she intended only to gain some experience there before returning to New York, but Bend complicated her plans.  She met and married Scott McCallou, a passionate fisherman and professional environmental advocate, for starters.    The longer she stayed, the more she realized she was putting down roots (a idea that initially was as scary to her as picking up a gun); McCallou felt, she writes,  like she was “marrying Oregon.”   She became deeply interested in the lives of people in struggling rural communities outside Bend.  Loggers bespeaking admiration for a favorite tree and hunters devoted to land conservation forced her to reconsider her notions of what it meant to be an environmentalist.  Encounters with hunters provoked questions about relationships to animals, especially those on her dinner plate, she had taken for granted.  Could she eat meat fully aware of its origins and of her responsibility for taking the lives that fed hers? 

To settle the question she began hunting.   Her answer would be an unequivocal but hard-won “yes.”   McCallou took the steps to begin hunting methodically and deliberately, but she had her share of anxieties and conflicts along the way and she isn’t afraid to let them show.   She had to let go of sterotypes about hunters and hunting she freely admits she took from the movies (including, yes, the nortorious Bambi), overcome severe gun shyness,  confront astonishment among relatives and friends when she informed them of her new venture,  and endure an acute bout of self-consciousness as a rare woman (and for that matter, an adult) in a hunter safety class.   Fellow hunters (including some prepubescent hunter safety classmates) are in most cases key to helping her overcome her doubts and discomforts through the helpfulness and safety-consciousness she finds among them, as well as the deep sense of ethics and the concern for land and wildlife they demonstrate.  McCallou’s greatest uncertainly, understandably enough, is whether she can actually pull the trigger on a game animal when the moment comes.  She delayed it by leaving her gun at home when she went on her first hunt in the company of some neighbors, though when the moment arrived, she found it curiously exhilarating.  (The feeling would become a familiar one since despite her initial dread of guns she turned out to be an excellent shot.)  Guilt would follow—as it does for most hunters—but she would come to see this as an expression the hunter’s respect for the animal taken.   What she felt most strongly after her first kill was a sense of the world becoming much closer than it ever can be when kept at a safe, bloodless remove.  

Yet as her hunter’s apprenticeship continues, the world’s risky and predatory dimensions get much too close for McCallou’s comfort.    A series of unexpected and sometimes inexplicable deaths among her family and friends stuns her and stirs doubts about whether she can continue to kill for sport and an occasional dinner.  She also begins to have doubts about beginning a family.  Her doubts give rise to an unpretentious but far-ranging meditation about mortality as a shared bond among creatures and a cause for humans no less than deer or pheasants to live as alertly and intensely as possible.  This carpe diem is a call not only to individual determination (though McCallou found her work ethic sharpened considerably  during this harrowing period), but to engagement in every way possible with the lives of all kinds in our surroundings, seeking the wealth they offer for both body and soul.   In light of these reflections, hunting becomes a means not only to eating ethically or connecting with a place, but to living in awareness of and contact with the cycles of life and death that give and take everything that makes our time on earth matter.    There is, as McCallou acknowledges, an ancient, aboriginal wisdom in these ideas.   However, her statement of them,  connecting the tooth-and-claw realities of the wild world to the familiar human tragedies that modern society and technology screen from view or divert us from much of the time, offers one of the most powerful contemporary defenses of hunting I’ve seen. 

Hunting immersed McCallou in a new way of seeing the world and a new culture, yet she stands consciously apart in some ways from most of hunters she encounters, a distance that gives her a critical perspective on the sport and its dominant ways of thinking.   She takes hunters at large to task for focusing excessively on issues like gun rights and threats to hunting from animal rights advocates while giving short shrift to dangers posed by the extractive industries and commercial development, and for reflexive hostility to the predators that help create a healthy ecosystem.  Though she oversimplifies her case and overlooks some marked exceptions, it is largely well founded and carries a message that needs to be heard.   It perhaps is an easy case for a newbie hunter raised in a liberal enclave on the east coast to make, though liberal anti-hunters and environmentalists don’t get off any easier.   Hunters, she reminds them, could be some of their most valuable allies in preserving the environment and resisting wanton consumerism.   Even those who couldn’t imagine ever killing an animal and eating it have ample reason, McCallou affirms, to put aside stereotypes of hunters and simplistic beliefs about the cruelty and backwardness of the sport to not only tolerate but support and honor hunting.  

Of course, as McCallou’s case demonstrates, some who couldn’t imagine shooting their supper eventually do just that.  If any recent book is likely to inspire a non-hunting reader to do the same, this is it.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Manistee & South Branch Au Sable, 6/27-29

A certain stretch of the Manistee above  M-72 gave me very consistent hex fishing for four years.  Some nights were better than others, but there were always bugs and there were always rising trout.  Some nights I fished in a crowd, some nights I had it to myself.  But last year I spent two nights there and saw good numbers spinners but no flies on the water.  This year wasn't even that good.

Wednesday, a few hex spinners started to show around ten, but a swarm never appeared.  Nothing emerged later.  Thursday I never even saw spinners.  That's really all there is to say about hex hatch 2012.    I'd been lulled by previous experience into thinking I'd found a surefire hex hole, but I stand thoroughly disabused of that notion. 

Ready for a change of pace, I spent Friday on the Au Sable's south branch in the upper Mason Tract.  Hexes are done on the south, so I figured I would enjoy a nice solitary evening catching brookies on blue winged olives, and have at least a shot at a late isonychia spinnerfall that would entice some larger trout.  Found plenty of rising trout from 7:00 on, but had a hard time connecting.  I watched the water for a while after wading in and saw a couple of flying ants tumble into the flow. I put one on and quickly landed a decent brook trout.   Believing I'd found the secret, I tossed the ant at a few other feeders and received only one short strike.  A few olives were flying around so I tried a #20 dun and drew more short strikes.  Many of these rising trout were quite small, and I didn't cast to the little ones at first. Finally I did out of desperation, and even they spurned me.  Getting refused by a 6" brook trout is one of the keener humiliations an angler can suffer.

Around 8:00 I was seeing quite a few small brown caddis in the air so I tied on a reasonable facsimile and got nothing, even though around  I was seeing a lot of splashy rises.   Only about half an hour later, as the feeding began to slow in the run I was on, did I find an emerger that would have worked.  By then I was seeing more smooth rises, as well as more BWOs in the air (though still not very many), so I tried my spinners and duns again, and again was refused by each fish that took notice of my fly.  Many didn't.

A bit after 9 the run seemed to have gone dead.  I had seen just a few iso spinners, so I cut back my leader and tied one on.  I started wading back to where I'd walked in only to see another group of active feeders two runs up.  The rises were quiet again, and stirred a few bubbles  but I didn't see anything on the surface the trout would be eating, even with the aid of my headlamp.  Having barely been able to see to tie the iso on, I wasn't going to attempt threading the hook eye of a #18 or 20 olive.   I cast the spinner to a few of the risers and caught one, a whopper 8" brookie.  Hooked a couple more briefly before feeding slowed and I kept moving upstream. 

Close to my walk-out point a heard a couple of other rises.  I can't say if they were consistent or not because  in the dark I couldn't see them, and the sound of most of them would have been drowned out by the fireworks that had begun exploding almost continuously once the sun had set.  Where I was, the tract is bordered by cottages, and most of their occupants  were apparently exploiting Michigan's recent legalization of high powered fireworks.  I kept drifting my iso through the run where the rises had sounded, and occasionally between the fusillades I heard more.   Sadly, I didn't hear the ones that counted.  Twice when lifting my line at the end of a drift I felt a fish pulling on it.  By that point it's too late to set the hook.  Except for the damn fireworks I would have landed a couple of good fish.   

I wouldn't have minded trying a little longer, maybe moving to another spot, but the blasts from beyond the tract kept coming.  My ears hurt from them--how loud would they have been close up? 

Another frustrating night of fishing, but at least I felt like I was back in the game.  If I was up there again tonight and someone told me I had a 50% chance of hitting a monster hex hatch on the Manistee, I think I'd still go to the south branch and try to crack the riddle of those twilight rises.   A little further from town, though. 

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

TDD Therapy, Stat!

Was over in Kalamazoo fishing with my dad on Gull Lake yesterday--left camera in dad's car, so no pics.  But a decent day in spite of being hot and bright.  Ended with a dozen decent size panfish (Kristine and I just ate my share for lunch), and a few just shy of legal bass. 

Trout deficit disorder (TDD) is setting in big time, so I'm headed to Grayling later this afternoon to catch the tail end of the hex hatch on the upper Manistee.  That's the plan, anyway.  Superhot days ahead, meaning, probably, superlate nights on the river. 

May get to check in while I'm there.  If not, see you sometime this weekend.

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Goose Banding, Pte. Mouillee 6/22

Every June, Michigan DNR staff and assorted volunteers band canada geese at Pte. Mouillee State Game Area.  I started hunting there last year and got to love the place.  I'm not going to give up my little marshes and potholes in the nearby rec areas, but something about big marsh hunting makes it engrossing.  Maybe the sheer number and variety of ducks on the wing, maybe a frustration at failing to call them in that leads to determination, maybe just the openness or expanse of them--so many possibilities to explore.  Whatever its appeal, Mouillee is a place I want to get as involved with as I can.   Went on a cleanup there last year, also to an open house just before waterfowl season started.   I wish there was a conservation group dedicated to it, such as other major waterfowling sites (Fish Point, Shiawassee) have. 

For now I'll settle for the odd volunteer project.  Notice about the banding day went up on Michigan Sportsman (see link at right) a couple weeks ago; last Thursday I was finally able to confirm, and on Friday night I got to bed early and set the alarm for 4 AM (shades of duck season!).  I made it to the area's headquarters minutes before the scheduled 6 AM start time, though we lingered a bit before getting started.

The banding process worked like this:  DNR employees and volunteers would take kayaks out into the marsh in areas where geese were sighted and drive them onto land in a spot of high ground.  Once there, folding pens we set up and volunteers would drive the geese into the pen; other volunteers formed a cordon stretching back from the edges of the pen to prevent the geese from  running off.  Two DNR workers stayed in the pen after the geese were in and the gates were shut to pick up birds and hand them to volunteers to carry over to the banders.  They would clip on the band, record its number, then turn the goose loose.

The geese ranged from babies still in fuzz to old veterans with necks as thick as a swan's.  And most were quite docile when picked up, which surprised me a little since they can be nasty tempered, even aggressive when I run across them along rivers or lakeshores.  The little ones put up no fight at all.  The guys in the pen just handed them off to whoever was nearby and they were as compliant as kittens in the hands of whoever carried them to the banders.  The adults often did struggle a bit, so the DNR workers would fold the head of each goose under one of its wings before giving it to someone. 

There were a lot of kids there, members of a boy scout troop and children of some of the adult volunteers. They carried most of the geese to the banders.  A little wary of the geese at first, they were eager to do the job once they saw the geese weren't going to hurt them.  Larger, feistier geese were handed off to adults.  Toward the end of the day I took one that had bitten one of the guys working in the pen.  It struggled as he passed it to me, then settled down for a while.  There was a backup of geese ready for banding, so I had to hold it for five minutes.  It was quiet for a while, but about a minute before I got to the bander it started thrashing around. I kept my arms firmly around; I actually appreciated feeling its struggles.  Usually when I pick up a wild animal it's dead or shortly will be.  Feeling the warmth and the full strength of one of the creatures than helps give me life was satisfying in some undefinable way.

Much as I enjoyed the day, my services weren't especially needed.  There were at least forty people out there, and many of them spent a large share of the morning standing around. There wasn't much they could do unless they forced themselves into the action.   The kids took care of most of the work, and they probably needed the experience more. 

The head biologist at Mouillee said geese banded there have been recovered from Saskatchewan to Alabama.  Very few things I do will have an impact felt that widely.  So my contributions, however meager, were worth the early wakeup and the hour's drive.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Huron River 6/21; (Huge) Fake Plastic Fish

Went to Island Park for a couple of hours last night.  Water super low--lots of bare gravel bars in spots where the water is knee high at typical midsummer water levels.  Dragged in a bunch of baby smallmouth on an OWB; switched to a black/orange cherno ant when I got into some quiet water and caught three rock bass that were 6" or so--semi-respectable fish.  It's a wonder I even got those since the ant was under near-constant assault by bluegill that couldn't get it in their mouths. 

Beautiful rainbow last night.  It actually did sprinkle for ten or fifteen minutes while I fished, though my shirt didn't get wet (left my rain jacket at home); the rain was too light.  Refreshing after a couple of back to back 90 degree days.

***********

Some folks at the Rio +20 climate conference must have gotten extremely bored, creative, and  thirsty.  Giant fish sculptures made from discarded plastic bottles:


If one of the conference attendees blows his/her travel grant money on the nightlife,  the deposit on these could fund a plane ride home.  More cool pics here.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

More is More

"Biodiversity" is a sacred word among environmental advocates, often for aesthetic rather than scientific reasons.  To many, there is something intrinsically beautiful and right-seeming about a landscape in which a wide range of species occupy a diversity of ecological niches. The greater the variety of species and relationships between them in a place, the richer and more beautiful the place.  To lose species and their roles in the landscape represents to many environmentalists an unquantifiable diminution of its beauty or an interruption of an organic harmony--like painting over a few burghers  in "Night Watch,", say.   Theodore Rooselvelt famously likened the loss of a species to the loss of one of the works of Shakespeare.

I'm sympathetic to this view.  Oh hell, I share it.

But recently some University of Michigan researchers found biodiversity can pay off in ways even ardent anti-environmentalists can appreciate:

Genetic diversity within a species can increase the yield of commercial crops. Diversity of tree species increases production on timber plantations. More fish species mean more stable yields for fishermen. 

Diversity in the types of plants that grow together also can make the plants more resistant to disease and invasive species, and in some cases make them pull more carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.

More on their findings here.


Maybe an ardent anti-environmentalist wouldn't appreciate the carbon-reducing function of biodiversity ("Anthropogenic climate change is a myth!" he brays...), but if as many suspect we are facing a future of escalating demand for ever scarcer natural resources  and food supplies are increasingly threatened, maybe keeping around as many life forms as we can is more than just a pleasant notion.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/06/07/151533/biodiversity-helps-sustain-human.html#storylink=c


Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Foodie Get Your Gun

So what's up with the recent reviews up books by people who took up hunting in adulthood because of dietary rather than sporting interests?  Certainly they're within the bounds of staple FTR content. But these authors are representative of a broader movement that's caught my interest: a growing interest in hunting among young urban professionals who have little or no previous experience with it, entering the sport out of a desire to limit their dependence on the industrial food system and eat the freshest, most sustainably sourced meat they can.

They're interesting to me partly because they represent a notable exception to the trend of declining participation in hunting.  And they don't fit the profile of most hunters, at least as I understand that.  Hunters for the most part have conservative social/political sensibilities, and however dedicated to conservation they might be, often are antagonistic toward broader forms of environmental protection and activism.  There exists what might amount to a red/blue divide between more typical hunters and the newer breed, a cultural clash noted by some members of the latter. 

Describing her initiation into hunting  Juliana Hanle recalled sitting in a hunters' safety class of mostly "worn looking" white men and hearing, among other things, lectures on the ethics and traditions of hunting. "Hunters have a duty to conservation, to protecting land and resources for sustained use," one of her instructors exhorted. "A hunter kills only as many creatures as a healthy ecosystem can afford."  But quickly he reassured the class that "conservation is not environmentalism."   Reflecting on the moment, Hanle supposed that to the instructor, “'environmentalism'” means something too extreme, irrelevant, and yuppie—a little like me, staring at him from the aisle two rows back."

Yet Hanle didn't  believe the divide between her and her instructor and classmates was  absolute and unbridgeable. "[F]rom where I sit," she writes, "conservation is environmentalism. In an America where food is produced on fear-inducing scales and where we throw away our meals as easily as we consume them, the idea of being conservative in what you kill and eat is countercultural."  She admired that "Most of these men were preparing to enter a hunting community sustained by tradition," a  tradition that meant their families "have been eating sustainably for generations."  In them she saw "signs of an unspoken, deep respect for the natural landscape,"  and wondered what other common ground she and they might have.

As I've written before, the division between outdoor enthusiasts who engage in "consumptive" activities (i.e., hunting and fishing) and those who don't is a tragedy for conservation, or environmentalism, or whatever you want to call it.  People who ought to be working together on so many things too often don't, partly because they can't get past negative assumptions and stereotypes about the other.  Sometimes there are valid reasons for the antagonism between them--some backpacker types are rabidly anti-gun, and some hunters sincerely believe you can never have too many roads cutting through the woods.   Some urban non-hunters people think most rural people are ignorant rednecks, and some rural hunters think city people are effete snobs.  The foodie hunters exist in the middle of these "two cultures" in the outdoor sports.   They represent some hope that a middle way of thinking about the outdoor sports--connected to tradition but aware of modern problems with how we use animals and how we stress the planet we live on--could in fact become the center.  







Monday, June 18, 2012

Book Review: Girl Hunter, by Georgia Pellegrini


Georgia Pellegrini is on a mission to save humanity—or at least to inspire readers of Girl Hunter to recover a lost measure of their humanity by harvesting their own meat from forest, field and sky.   This project had its origins in a request to kill a turkey with her bare hands.  A stockbroker-turned-chef, Pellegrini was working for a restaurant that operated its own farm when she and several fellow cooks were dispatched to harvest free-ranging turkeys for the evening’s menu.   Though a lifelong meat eater, Pellegrini realized then she didn’t have the stomach to kill her own food, and froze on the spot while her colleagues chased the birds down on foot and cut their throats. She admits the experience briefly swayed her toward vegetarianism.    But the process of cleaning a turkey, which she describes in lingering and intimate detail, stirred “a dormant, primal part of me,” she writes; it “made the kind of sense that I could feel deep in my marrow,” and revealed to her what it truly meant to be an omnivore.

 It ultimately launched her on a quest to learn “if it is truly possible today to live off the best your hands can produce.”  Girl Hunter tracks Pellegrini’s pursuit of this question through forays around the US hunting deer, pheasants, turkeys, and wild hogs.  Her short answer is “yes,” though by the end of the book this finding seems almost incidental.  Hunting, she discovers, is not only practical but transformative.  With a nod to the longstanding thesis that hunting among early humanoid groups gave rise to the intelligence and social organization that defined our species, Pellegrini contends that hunting can give people a fuller sense of their humanity by immersing them in the wild world that is their natural home and the true source of their nourishment.   She foresees that such awareness “will propel a shift in how we view and interact with the world we eat in,” with the result that “the kind of food we demand, as omnivores, will never be the same.” 

Despite these sweeping convictions, Girl Hunter is at bottom a story of personal awakening, a conversion narrative of sorts.  Over the four years of hunts recounted here, Pellegrini found herself profoundly changed—humanized, as she sees it—by active participation in nature.  She saw herself relating to landscapes in a different way by virtue of turning to them for sustenance. She learned and came to value an array of skills she’d never known existed.   Animals ceased to be mere  ingredients and became instead individuals, teachers,  and objects of immense respect.   Stereotypes about hunters and rural people absorbed during life in New York and Paris fell away as she spent time among generous, learned,  and amiable guides, ranchers, and planters.    

The vivid portrayals of the individuals who initiated Pellegrini into hunting are among the most engaging parts of the book, conveying their knowledge, care, and passion about hunting, even when these are stated silently or indirectly.  Their examples show too how one’s life as a hunter and the rest of his or her life can shape each other.   Her descriptions of landscapes immerse readers in the sensory experience of hunting, and she does not overlook the discomforts that can come with a day afield.  Being a chef, Pellegrini naturally describes the preparing, cooking, and consumption of wild game in great (and deeply sensual) detail.   For those wishing to follow her example, each chapter concludes with an assortment of recipes for preparing the animals hunted in it.  

Unlike Tovar Cerulli and some other literary hunters, Pellegrini doesn’t spend much time pondering the ethics of hunting.  Its historic role in human societies is justification enough for her.   Neither does she devote much of the book to considering her position as a woman in the largely male world of hunting, despite the title’s calling attention to that.    Aside from an unwelcome “slap on the ass” at a wild game dinner party (a sensation all too familiar to her from work in brokerages and kitchens dominated  by men), her entry into what is still mostly the domain of men appears to bring  few or no complications—a good thing, of course, but then why headline the issue?  She acknowledges that as a woman hunter she is atypical, mentioning that she seldom encounters women in hunting situations.  But what about those she does?  How might their experiences add to what it means to be a “girl hunter”?

By advocating hunting  as a means to eating more mindfully, Pellegrini aligns herself with “foodie” authors like Michael Pollan.   And by presenting hunts taken on sprawling private ranches or hunting preserves, in the company of affluent planters or retired Berkely academics, leading to dinners replete with fine wines and Cuban cigars, she is open to the same charge of elitism often lobbed at Pollan and his counterparts.  The recipes Pellegrini offers—Poached Dove and Pears in  Brandy Sauce, or Pheasant Tagine, for instance—don’t offer any defense, and certainly don’t make hunting seem more practical or approachable (though perhaps these may be inevitable in a book by an elite chef).  But, at the risk of stereotyping a bit,  hunting is likely to seem more alien to sippers of Chateauneuf du Pape than to fans of Pfeiffer’s.  Georgia Pellegrini may be just the evangelist to bring them into the congregation of the camouflaged.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Smartphones Go Stone Age

From Grist:

If your nature hike goes seriously awry, your cell phone will probably be your best chance of survival — if you can get signal, you can let people know where you are. If you can’t get signal, well, it is basically a hunk of metal. But, it’s a hunk of metal that can (if absolutely necessary) be busted up and used to make a signal mirror, a compass, a spear, a fire-starter, and a fishing lure. Saved by the cell!


Yes, a fishing lure!  The article advises:  Use sharp bits of metal for fishing lures, because fish will eat any damn thing.

I want to fish where this guy does. I've been wasting money buying multiple versions of the same fly because on the streams I frequent the fish may prefer emergers or duns,  caddis with shucks or without, brushy or streamlined nymphs...   In all seriousness, I'll bet the contents of my fly boxes are worth at least as much as some of the fancier smartphones cost.

Over the years I've found a couple of discarded (probably dunked) cell phones along rivers.  I've just picked them up and thrown them away after I got off the water.  Now maybe I should start collecting them in my vest in case of emergency.

Monday, June 11, 2012

Of Rivers and Home Repairs

For several years I've watched cracks in the bottom step of the stairs leading down from our front deck widening, felt the it (and the treads above it, to a lesser extent) sagging further each season under my footfalls.  Last Thursday,  while descending the stairs to go to our shed, roughly the front half of the bottom step broke loose from the beam holding it in place when I stepped on it.  A light kick to the step probably would have splintered off the loose piece entirely.   I didn't fall fortunately, not that I would have been hurt much if I did.  But when the stair cracked I heard my weekend stolen away.   The whole staircase (five steps, plus the stringers framing them) would need to be replaced. 

We plotted out the job and bought our lumber Saturday morning, ripped out the stairs and made some initial cuts in the afternoon and evening.  While tentatively fitting new pieces into the existing deck parts we learned we'd need to make some adjustments we didn't forsee--typical for a project.  Yesterday, following a late start and a return trip to the store, we managed to put the new beams and a few of the steps in place.  We will likely finish tonight, which may be the most notable  aspect of this undertaking.

A lot of projects around our house are "in process."  With some, the process has gone on for years.  My work, Kristine's work and school, periods of disinterest, and, yes, my outdoor pursuits have gotten in the way.  We're trying make headway this summer--living in the state of disorder parts of our house are in is getting old. Frankly, it's becoming maddening.  But things go slowly.

I've commented here on occasion that my compulsion to fish isn't as keen as it used to be.  Presently,  I'd say it's at full strength again.   The few forays for trout and smallmouth I've made this season have whetted my enthusiasm, of course, but lately the contrast between the clutter of home and beauty  of the river world has done so even more.   Fishing at times feels like the sole source of beauty or grace in my life, and the more I confront the shabbiness of my own habitat, the more I want to seek out that of fish, mayflies, swallows, and minks. 

That habitat give an impression of fullness, of completion, markedly in contrast to the ongoing state of incompletion, around my house.  A healthy river (and even the urban Huron largely is one), considered in any given moment, seems to have all it needs--you can see its parts working together to yield an unanswerable vibrancy and presence.  Of course, that's a mistaken impression.  Rivers are the ultimate work-in-process, and to live closely with them means giving over a good deal of one's life, mentally, spiritually, sensorially,  to a process of incompletion.  That process over time often becomes a comfort zone.

I'm not blaming my stalled household projects on my affinity for rivers. But my affinity for rivers may help me to  keep my peace of mind as we  slowly sort out our household disarray.  The current state of chaos around here isn't permanent or ruinous.  Good things still arise from our life despite it.   Kristine and I won't have the home we want if we simply go with the flow of our lives as determined by our jobs or habits, but the presence of things undone need not be a reason for anger  or resignation. Besides, when the projects not yet finished are, others will need doing, just as surely as clouds will gather over a river just shed of a storm.